Y. I'm happy enough to wait a few more days. I wasn't able to kick off the regression tests last week. Should I wait for the new parsers to run the regression tests?
-----Original Message----- From: David Meikle [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, November 3, 2017 7:42 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Tika 1.17? Sounds good. I have a couple of new parsers I would like to slot in but not had a chance the last few months. Will go for it over the weekend, if that works for you Tim. Cheers, Dave On 3 November 2017 at 15:19, Mattmann, Chris A (3010) < [email protected]> wrote: > Let’s make it so ( > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative Office (3010) > Manager, NSF & Open Source Projects Formulation and Development Offices > (8212) > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 180-503E, Mailstop: 180-503 > Email: [email protected] > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > On 11/3/17, 7:35 AM, "Allison, Timothy B." <[email protected]> wrote: > > All, > > PDFBox 2.0.8 is now integrated. I want to fix TIKA-2490 before we > release 1.17. Are there other issues that are blockers or you'd like to > fix before 1.17 (TIKA-2471, maybe?)? > > I plan to run initial large scale regression tests shortly for rfc822 > and mbox because of TIKA-2478. I'll run the full regression tests before > cutting the RC, but I want to focus on those for now. Other requests? > > Cheers, > > Tim > > >
