Thanks folks….

I’ve been going through the Wiki a lot over the past three months, and I’d love 
to go through and clean out/update the old content.  

 What do you think of me cloning a wiki page, making a whole sale set of edits, 
getting review of those edits from the community, and assuming it passes 
muster, then bringing the edits back to the original page?   



Eric

> On Oct 29, 2019, at 7:00 PM, Ken Krugler <kkrug...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Oct 29, 2019, at 3:10 PM, Nick Burch <apa...@gagravarr.org 
>> <mailto:apa...@gagravarr.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> On Tue, 29 Oct 2019, Tim Allison wrote:
>>> Anyone object if I grant write access to our wiki to Eric Pugh.  He slacked 
>>> me a request.
>> 
>> I'd almost be tempted to say that we should grant access to all ASF 
>> Committers to our wiki.
> 
> +1, CTR FTW :)
> 
> — Ken
> 
>> (Note - not all confluence users, as that includes fresh spamy sign-ups). As 
>> long as we get notifications of changes (which I think we still do 
>> post-migration?), so we can double check their changes, it should help other 
>> ASF project committers contribute
>> 
>> Otherwise, for non-committers, I'd suggest we take an approach similar to 
>> the old-wiki one from incubator, which is to grant access to anyone who 
>> writes a vaguely sensible looking email to the list to request it (see above 
>> for change notifications double-check!)
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Nick
> 
> --------------------------
> Ken Krugler
> http://www.scaleunlimited.com <http://www.scaleunlimited.com/>
> custom big data solutions & training
> Hadoop, Cascading, Cassandra & Solr
> 

_______________________
Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | 
http://www.opensourceconnections.com <http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | 
My Free/Busy <http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>  
Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed 
<https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw>
    
This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be 
Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of whether 
attachments are marked as such.

Reply via email to