[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16977649#comment-16977649
]
Luís Filipe Nassif commented on TIKA-2986:
------------------------------------------
{quote}How do we know which ones are a _must_ though? Many we expect, but for
some formats we've had to guess, and some formats are actually more flexible
than the spec suggests... That's why I thought a different detector mode might
be cleaner / more obvious
{quote}
Agreed, that was just a thought. A new detector, or a configuration for the
current MimeTypes detector, will be cleaner and easier to enable.
> Edge case (?) in file type detection
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: TIKA-2986
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2986
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Tim Allison
> Priority: Trivial
>
> One of my colleagues, Philip Southam, recently came across a file that was
> identified as an Acrobat fdf file. The particular file was some kind of
> binary file with a ".fdf" extension, but not an Acrobat fdf.
> Our current MimeTypes algorithm runs magic first, and then it tries to use
> the file extension. If the file extension suggests a child mime type of what
> was found via magic, that is used. The problem with this file was that the
> magic {{%FDF-}} was not found, so from the magic step, it was
> {{application/octet}}, and then the file extension, which was ".fdf", was
> selected because {{application/vnd.fdf}} is a child of {{application/octet}}.
> If feels like we might want to add a rule that if a mime definition has a
> defined magic and that magic is not found, we should not then fall back to
> the file extension. Or, is there a better way to prevent this from happening?
> Or, is this just an edge case that we should ignore?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
