[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17052332#comment-17052332
]
Tilman Hausherr edited comment on TIKA-3059 at 3/5/20, 5:03 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
And yes it's (partly) a feature, getExtGStateNames() returns the resource names
(keyset) without checking whether there is a value attached 😂
However the PDFBox code in ImageGraphicsEngine is wrong, it should have a null
check, I'll fix that later.
was (Author: tilman):
And yes it's (partly) a feature, getExtGStateNames() returns the resource names
(keyset) without checking whether there is a value attached 😂
However the PDFBox code in ImageGraphicsEngine is wrong, it should have a check.
> New NPE in ImageGraphicsEngine
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: TIKA-3059
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3059
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Tim Allison
> Priority: Major
> Attachments:
> 40f86f17048dbe5402a98b2c2c19161e813f99710137a96d8aca15d0c4603183, Screen Shot
> 2020-03-05 at 9.40.27 AM.png
>
>
> When we run the new inline image extraction code on some PDFs, we're getting
> a new NPE.
> {noformat}
> for (COSName name : res.getExtGStateNames()) {
> PDSoftMask softMask = res.getExtGState(name).getSoftMask();
> {noformat}
> In some cases, res.getExtGStateNames() appears to return COSNames that cannot
> then be found by res.getExtGState(name).
> We can add a null check to Tika for now. Is this a bug or feature in PDFBox?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
