Didn't I "fix" this in master:
https://github.com/apache/tika/commit/f0ae10b072d7d486fed227088d82a3fd4a8d4f1f
?
The build should work now. I updated the release process documentation to
turn back on "fail the build on vulnerability" right before release.
I agree that we need to continue to update our dependencies, and I need to
cherry-pick a bunch of commits to branch_1x, which I'll do today.
But, the build should work on master... let me know if it doesn't.
Cheers,
Tim
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 7:24 AM Eric Pugh <[email protected]>
wrote:
> If you bump cxf one version, then the complaints stop ;-)
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/tika/pull/316/commits/ee93e6d3d91bdfc40f838556c13698ea5c78e936
>
>
>
> > On Apr 8, 2020, at 5:35 AM, Sergey Beryozkin <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Lewis
> >
> > Getting one of the latest releases should be fine; while I've been out of
> > touch with CXF recently, I can ask around for some version advice as the
> > guys deal with the security vulnerabilities seriously there, if
> addressing
> > this issue proves problematic
> > Cheers, Sergey
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 10:44 PM Lewis John McGibbney <[email protected]
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I suspected this was the case folks :)
> >> I actually really like this idea.
> >> I'll take the action item to address this seeing as I pulled it up...
> >> seeing as I am also working on tika-server right now I'll also take the
> >> action item to address the vulnerable CXF deps.
> >> Thanks,
> >> Lewis
> >>
> >> On 2020/04/06 16:19:16, Tim Allison <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> We shouldn't have any at release time, but they will obviously creep
> in
> >>> between releases
> >>>
> >>> Except the time, where I did the release and was trying to build it for
> >>> updating the site, and this had already kicked in. :(
> >>>
> >>> Y, we can turn this to warn, as long as we run it with fail as part of
> >> the
> >>> release process.
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 9:59 AM Nick Burch <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Mon, 6 Apr 2020, Eric Pugh wrote:
> >>>>> Maybe this needs better documentation, however this is a “works as
> >>>>> designed” feature!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> To avoid the build failing, run mvn package -Dossindex.fail=false
> >>>>
> >>>> Should we maybe have this set to false by default, and only enabled
> >>>> on release builds?
> >>>>
> >>>> (We shouldn't have any at release time, but they will obviously creep
> >> in
> >>>> between releases)
> >>>>
> >>>> Nick
> >>>
> >>
>
> _______________________
> Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 |
> http://www.opensourceconnections.com <
> http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <
> http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <
> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw>
>
> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be
> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of
> whether attachments are marked as such.
>
>