Yeah! You did respond earlier. I think it might have been me who failed to respond.
I think 2.0.0 is fine as is. Still tons of value there. Definitely a lot more to go coming from my end as soon as I unbury from tasks. -Nicholas On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 10:52 AM Tim Allison <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Nicholas, > > I can't remember if I ever responded to this...sorry! I think scaling > to multiple tika-servers is a client-side responsibility. We might > model it in the tika-server-client module, but I don't think we should > hold up 2.0.0 for that. > > Let me know if you disagree. > > Cheers, > > Tim > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 12:08 PM Nicholas DiPiazza > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > One thing I think is still remaining is how the fetch queue is > distributed > > horizontally to multiple tika servers. I don't quite understand how that > is > > currently set up. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 11:03 AM Tim Allison <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Makes sense. Thank you! Anything else we need to do? > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 11:00 AM Nicholas DiPiazza > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I would like to make sure the Tika Pipes has one more full end-to-end > > > test > > > > case that covers the creation of configurations using the rest API. > Right > > > > now the test exists is completely based on Tika run from CLI. > > > > > > > > I will work on this asap hopefully something by monday. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 4:40 PM Tim Allison <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > All, > > > > > I plan to run the full regression tests in the next few days. > What > > > would > > > > > you think of going for a 2.0.0 release next week or so? > > > > > We should release 1.27 shortly thereafter. I think? > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > > > >
