Hi, folks.

I'm +1 to moving to jdk11. Even some distros dropping 1.8 lately so I don't
have strong points against letting 11 be minimal version.

We use mix of 11 as target and 11+17 as runtime with 1.8 for some legacy
applications like Nexus OSS.

I'm interested to know how much of our downstream users run Tika as a
library and not in isolated context like tika-server/tika-pipes.

пт, 25 мар. 2022 г., 20:52 Eric Pugh <[email protected]>:

> If Java 11 makes life easier, then shipping it for Tika 2 would make sense
> to me.   Java 8 is well….    old….
>
> > On Mar 25, 2022, at 12:04 PM, Tilman Hausherr <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Weak +1 for keeping java 8 because it's long term supported by Oracle.
> > Tilman
> >
> > Am 25.03.2022 um 15:46 schrieb Tim Allison:
> >> All,
> >>   I'm somewhat interested in moving to require Java 11 to clean up
> >> some dependency stuff.  This is not a burning need.
> >>  I wanted to get a sense from our community. Do we still need to
> >> support 8?  If so, for how long?
> >>
> >>   Cheers,
> >>
> >>                 Tim
> >
> >
>
> _______________________
> Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 |
> http://www.opensourceconnections.com <
> http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <
> http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <
> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw>
>
> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be
> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of
> whether attachments are marked as such.
>
>

Reply via email to