[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3727?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Björn Kautler updated TIKA-3727:
--------------------------------
    Description: 
Similar to TIKA-3535 tika should not depend on any JCL implementations as this 
might downstream conflict with other implementations.
{{org.apache.tika:tika-parsers-standard-package:2.3.0}} depends on 
{{jcl-over-slf4j}} which is a JCL implementation forwarding to SLF4J.
But if a downstream project for example has {{log4j-jcl}}, you suddenly have 
two JCL implementations.
The tika projects should not depend on any logging implementations or bridges.

  was:
Similar to TIKA-3535 tika should not depend on any JCL implementations as this 
might downstream conflict with other implementations.
{{org.apache.tika:tika-parsers-standard-package:2.3.0}} depends on 
{{jcl-slf4j}} which is a JCL implementation forwarding to SLF4J.
But if a downstream project for example has {{log4j-jcl}}, you suddenly have 
two JCL implementations.
The tika projects should not depend on any logging implementations or bridges.


> Do not depend on JCL implementations
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TIKA-3727
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3727
>             Project: Tika
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.3.0
>            Reporter: Björn Kautler
>            Priority: Major
>
> Similar to TIKA-3535 tika should not depend on any JCL implementations as 
> this might downstream conflict with other implementations.
> {{org.apache.tika:tika-parsers-standard-package:2.3.0}} depends on 
> {{jcl-over-slf4j}} which is a JCL implementation forwarding to SLF4J.
> But if a downstream project for example has {{log4j-jcl}}, you suddenly have 
> two JCL implementations.
> The tika projects should not depend on any logging implementations or bridges.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)

Reply via email to