[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17539054#comment-17539054
 ] 

Sam Stephens commented on TIKA-3710:
------------------------------------

{quote}The h1 isn't quite as unique as we might like, and maybe not as good as 
some of the other ones
{quote}
Honestly, I'm not so worried about the HTML fragment detection, because that's 
never going to be perfect. A bare text string without any HTML tags is 
technically an HTML fragment. In the modern world where people can and do 
define their own HTML tags, you _could_ say that any file opens with a valid 
tag as defined by the W3C is HTML, but that feels open to false positives.

> HTML document detected incorrect as message/rfc822
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TIKA-3710
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3710
>             Project: Tika
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: detector
>    Affects Versions: 2.3.0
>            Reporter: Sam Stephens
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: html-that-looks-like-rfc822.html
>
>
> I'm detecting content types and extracting text from documents using the 
> AutoDetectParser.
> I've received some documents that are HTML fragments generated from emails. 
> The documents are clearly HTML, not emails, but the AutoDetectParser gives me 
> the MIME type message/rfc822 and no text. I've attached an example.
> It looks like the presence of From:, Sent:, and Subject: at the beginning of 
> lines is why the documents are matching RFC822. However, I believe the 
> presence of HTML before these headers means the document is not valid RFC822.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)

Reply via email to