[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3957?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17678800#comment-17678800
]
Hudson commented on TIKA-3957:
------------------------------
SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Tika ยป tika-main-jdk8 #991 (See
[https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tika/job/tika-main-jdk8/991/])
TIKA-3957 -- handle parsing behavior diffs btwn java 8 and (java 11 and 17)
(tallison:
[https://github.com/apache/tika/commit/2dc69756e4df9df35920cf95345edfb718cd343e])
* (edit)
tika-parsers/tika-parsers-standard/tika-parsers-standard-modules/tika-parser-mail-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/tika/parser/mailcommons/MailDateParser.java
* (edit)
tika-parsers/tika-parsers-standard/tika-parsers-standard-modules/tika-parser-mail-commons/src/test/java/org/apache/tika/parser/mailcommons/MailDateParserTest.java
> Refactor email date parsing
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: TIKA-3957
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3957
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Tim Allison
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.7.0
>
>
> In looking at mime4j's source code, they have a much more elegant solution
> for date parsing. Let's use their code as a model and yet add the flexibility
> that we currently allow.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
