[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17769674#comment-17769674
]
Maxim Solodovnik commented on TIKA-4143:
----------------------------------------
Maybe it can be BOM? :)
> Consider adding alternative to fat jar artifacts
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TIKA-4143
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4143
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Tim Allison
> Priority: Major
>
> With jpms, it feels like shading is not a great option.
> I'm not proposing getting rid of fat jars in 3.x. I'm only proposing
> offering thin-jar options in addition to our usual shaded fat jars.
> I'm opening this ticket to discuss options for packaging tika-app,
> tika-server and possibly other components in non-fat jars.
> For app and server, we could put dependencies in the lib/ directory next to
> the main jar and add "lib" to the classpath of the main jar? Then zip the
> main jar and lib directory for distribution?
> Other recommendations?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
