[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17841242#comment-17841242
]
Tim Allison commented on TIKA-4243:
-----------------------------------
I really, really want to clean up our configuration, and moving to JSON makes
sense.
I agree we need to support the legacy config of 2.x in 3.x.
Is there a reason not to use plain old Jackson databind? What does
jsonschema2pojo buy us?
Will this new capability live in tika-serialization?
It will be great to convert these config objects to Records in Java 17, er Tika
4.x?
Thank you [~ndipiazza]!
> tika configuration overhaul
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: TIKA-4243
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4243
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: config
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0
> Reporter: Nicholas DiPiazza
> Priority: Major
>
> In 3.0.0 when dealing with Tika, it would greatly help to have a Typed
> Configuration schema.
> In 3.x can we remove the old way of doing configs and replace with Json
> Schema?
> Json Schema can be converted to Pojos using a maven plugin
> [https://github.com/joelittlejohn/jsonschema2pojo]
> This automatically creates a Java Pojo model we can use for the configs.
> This can allow for the legacy tika-config XML to be read and converted to the
> new pojos easily using an XML mapper so that users don't have to use JSON
> configurations yet if they do not want.
> When complete, configurations can be set as XML, JSON or YAML
> tika-config.xml
> tika-config.json
> tika-config.yaml
> Replace all instances of tika config annotations that used the old syntax,
> and replace with the Pojo model serialized from the xml/json/yaml.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
