The positive side is that it's less interruptions.
One negative side is that there seems to be a maximum. Today it didn't
report the AWS update, which was detected in the past.
Tilman
On 29.04.2024 16:34, Tim Allison wrote:
The move to weekly dependabot has been a bit of a relief for me personally.
Our mail list isn't clogged w daily dependabot updates (and yes, I know I
can apply a filter :/).
How is it working for everyone else?
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 4:09 PM Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org> wrote:
you start deleting them reflexively out of your email!
Not Tilman!!!
Let's move to weekly and see how that works?
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 3:57 PM Eric Pugh
<ep...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
Hence why I like the monthly unless it’s a special case…. The flood of
updates just means you start deleting them reflexively out of your email!
Now, if you have a dependency and you’re maybe actively working on it, and
it’s changing quickly, then that might be an argument for daily.
On Apr 10, 2024, at 12:53 PM, Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de>
wrote:
I'm fine with daily because this way we can learn ASAP if there are
troubles with new dependency versions, although I'm now too busy.
Tilman
-- Original-Nachricht --
Von: Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org>
Betreff: Bump dependabot to weekly?
Datum: 10.04.2024, 18:08 Uhr
An: <dev@tika.apache.org> <dev@tika.apache.org>
All,
Tilman has been doing heroic work keeping us up to date with
dependabot's PRs. Given our pace of releases, would it make sense to
backoff to weekly updates?
Before running regression tests, we'd run the update plugin to make
sure that we're up to date.
What do you think?
Best,
Tim
_______________________
Eric Pugh | Founder | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 |
http://www.opensourceconnections.com <
http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <
http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <
https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw
This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be
Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of
whether attachments are marked as such.
