[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17847335#comment-17847335
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TIKA-4256:
--------------------------------------

tballison opened a new pull request, #1762:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tika/pull/1762

   <!--
     Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
     or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
     distributed with this work for additional information
     regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
     to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
     "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
     with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
   
       http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
   
     Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
     software distributed under the License is distributed on an
     "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
     KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
     specific language governing permissions and limitations
     under the License.
   -->
   
   Thanks for your contribution to [Apache Tika](https://tika.apache.org/)! 
Your help is appreciated!
   
   Before opening the pull request, please verify that
   * there is an open issue on the [Tika issue 
tracker](https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TIKA) which describes the 
problem or the improvement. We cannot accept pull requests without an issue 
because the change wouldn't be listed in the release notes.
   * the issue ID (`TIKA-XXXX`)
     - is referenced in the title of the pull request
     - and placed in front of your commit messages surrounded by square 
brackets (`[TIKA-XXXX] Issue or pull request title`)
   * commits are squashed into a single one (or few commits for larger changes)
   * Tika is successfully built and unit tests pass by running `mvn clean test`
   * there should be no conflicts when merging the pull request branch into the 
*recent* `main` branch. If there are conflicts, please try to rebase the pull 
request branch on top of a freshly pulled `main` branch
   * if you add new module that downstream users will depend upon add it to 
relevant group in `tika-bom/pom.xml`.
   
   We will be able to faster integrate your pull request if these conditions 
are met. If you have any questions how to fix your problem or about using Tika 
in general, please sign up for the [Tika mailing 
list](http://tika.apache.org/mail-lists.html). Thanks!
   




> Allow inlining of ocr'd text in container document
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TIKA-4256
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4256
>             Project: Tika
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Tim Allison
>            Priority: Major
>
> For legacy tika, we're inlining all content from embedded files including ocr 
> content of embedded images.
> However, for the RecursiveParserWrapper, /rmeta , -J option, users have to 
> stitch inlined image ocr text back into the container file's content.
> For example, if a docx has an image in it and tesseract is invoked, the 
> structure will notionally be:
> [
>   { "type":"docx", "content": "main content of the file"}
>   { "type":"jpeg", "content": "ocr'd content", "embeddedType":"INLINE"}
> ]
> It would be useful to allow an option to inline the extracted text in the 
> parent document. I think we want to keep the embedded inline object so that 
> we don't lose metadata from it. So I propose this kind of output:
> [
>   { "type":"docx", "content": "<body>main content of the file <div 
> type=\"ocr\">ocr'd content</div></body>"}
>   { "type":"jpeg", "content": "ocr'd content", "embeddedType":"INLINE"}
> ]
> This proposal includes the ocr'd content marked by <div/> in the container 
> file, and it includes the ocr'd text in the embedded image.
> For now this proposal does not include inlining ocr'd text from thumbnails. 
> We can do that on a later ticket if desired.
> This will allow a more intuitive search for non-file forensics users and will 
> be more similar to what we're doing with rendering a page -> ocr in PDFs when 
> that is configured.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to