[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18035890#comment-18035890
]
Tim Allison commented on TIKA-4529:
-----------------------------------
Makes sense.
We're in the process of adding a grpc server that will also be dockerized. So,
theoretically, we'd have three types of artifacts each with a base and "full"
(to include tesseract).
What's the best way to manage that?
>From the github side, we currently have:
>[https://github.com/apache/tika-docker]
Will we need two new repos? tika-grpc and tika-app?
Do we publish all six artifacts to the same hub.docker.com/r/apache/tika or do
we need new locations there as well?
> tika-app docker image
> ---------------------
>
> Key: TIKA-4529
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4529
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: docker
> Reporter: Mikhail Khludnev
> Priority: Minor
>
> It would be nice to have docker image with tika-app.jar. It's quite usable
> for serverless integration for clouds. eg it's possible to start "serverless"
> container (think about aws batch), mount object storages and convert one (or
> many??) files
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
