18 works. Honestly, any number *can* be changed in the future. You wouldn’t want to do it capriocsly, but we aren’t bound to anything beyond public perception.
In a lot of ways, just communicating clearly the expectations is the key thing. > On Aug 24, 2026, at 10:57 AM, Tilman Hausherr <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'd concur with the highest number that other people who have a higher > involvement are willing to accept. > Tilman > > Am 24.08.2026 um 16:49 schrieb Tim Allison: >> Makes sense. >> >> Tilman and Eric, is 18 months acceptable? >> >> On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 10:17 AM Tilman Hausherr <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Am 24.08.2026 um 15:58 schrieb Tim Allison: >>>> What do others think? >>> >>> I'm always in favor of long maintenance times because of users bound to >>> "old" jdk's. >>> >>> Tilman >>> > Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast, a leader in email security and cyber resilience. Mimecast integrates email defenses with brand protection, security awareness training, web security, compliance and other essential capabilities. Mimecast helps protect large and small organizations from malicious activity, human error and technology failure; and to lead the movement toward building a more resilient world. To find out more, visit our website.
