[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18110855#comment-18110855
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TIKA-4856:
--------------------------------------
tballison opened a new pull request, #3118:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tika/pull/3118
<!--
Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
distributed with this work for additional information
regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
"License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
software distributed under the License is distributed on an
"AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
specific language governing permissions and limitations
under the License.
-->
Thanks for your contribution to [Apache Tika](https://tika.apache.org/)!
Your help is appreciated!
Before opening the pull request, please verify that
* there is an open issue on the [Tika issue
tracker](https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TIKA) which describes the
problem or the improvement. We cannot accept pull requests without an issue
because the change wouldn't be listed in the release notes.
* the issue ID (`TIKA-XXXX`)
- is referenced in the title of the pull request
- and placed in front of your commit messages surrounded by square
brackets (`[TIKA-XXXX] Issue or pull request title`)
* commits are squashed into a single one (or few commits for larger changes)
* Tika builds and unit tests pass with `./mvnw clean install` (`clean test`
alone cannot resolve the pipes plugin zips)
* if you used a generative AI tool: follow the [ASF Generative Tooling
Guidance](https://www.apache.org/legal/generative-tooling.html) (`Generated-by:
<tool>` in the commit message), and consider running the pre-flight in
`.skills/devs/pr-review/SKILL.md` — fix what it finds; don't paste its report
here
* there should be no conflicts when merging the pull request branch into the
*recent* `main` branch. If there are conflicts, please try to rebase the pull
request branch on top of a freshly pulled `main` branch
* if you add new module that downstream users will depend upon add it to
relevant group in `tika-bom/pom.xml`.
We will be able to faster integrate your pull request if these conditions
are met. If you have any questions how to fix your problem or about using Tika
in general, please sign up for the [Tika mailing
list](http://tika.apache.org/mail-lists.html). Thanks!
> /unpack/thumbnail: return the document thumbnail with its metadata
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TIKA-4856
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4856
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Dominik Schmidt
> Priority: Major
>
> With TIKA-4850 through TIKA-4855 every container format that carries a
> thumbnail emits it as a THUMBNAIL embedded document, the PDF parser renders
> pages as RENDERING documents, and the EMF/WMF renderer turns the vector
> thumbnails of Office documents into raster ones. Getting "the thumbnail of
> this file" out of that still takes format knowledge on the client: the
> THUMBNAIL of a Word or Excel file is an EMF/WMF whose usable form is the
> RENDERING underneath it, a PDF has no THUMBNAIL but a page RENDERING, the
> THUMBNAIL of a DOCX inside a ZIP is not the ZIP's, and with rendering enabled
> the picture of an embedded OLE object is a RENDERING too. Plus the request
> config that switches the renderers on.
> Proposal: POST /unpack/thumbnail next to /unpack and /unpack/all, multipart
> like them. It runs the usual forked parse in unpack mode with a fixed parse
> context (PDF page 1 rendered, EMF/WMF rendered) and picks, in this order: the
> raster THUMBNAIL at depth 1; the rendering of that thumbnail; the depth-1
> RENDERING of PDF page 1. The endpoint extracts what the document carries; it
> does not resize, convert or generate previews.
> The response is JSON: the /rmeta metadata object of the selected embedded
> document, and the image as base64. Thumbnails are small, so the encoding
> overhead does not matter, and the caller gets type, dimensions, origin
> (stored thumbnail or rendering, tk:rendering:rendered-by) and path in one
> round trip without unpacking a zip. 204 when the document has no thumbnail.
> {
> "metadata": {
> "Content-Type": "image/png",
> "Content-Length": "8459",
> "tiff:ImageWidth": "800",
> "tiff:ImageLength": "1131",
> "tk:embedded-resource-type": "RENDERING",
> "tk:embedded-resource-path": "/thumbnail.emf/thumbnail.png",
> "tk:embedded-depth": "2",
> "tk:rendering:rendered-by": "poi-metafile-renderer",
> "tk:resource-name": "thumbnail.png"
> },
> "image": "iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAA..."
> }
> To keep the selection rule short, the metafile renderer could give the
> rendering of a THUMBNAIL the THUMBNAIL type as well (its
> tk:rendering:rendered-by tells it apart), so a raster thumbnail is a
> THUMBNAIL regardless of whether the document stored it as PNG or as EMF.
> What do you think?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
