On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yeah, then i'd say just keep 2.1.0 as beta, and make sure to highlight > the change in the next release notes, so as not to surprise extension > developers badly.
I agree with this approach. The difference between alpha and beta is very subtle anyway. Most projects would probably only make a distinction between GA and "not" GA :-) Greg
