2009/7/27 Greg Reddin <[email protected]>: > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Antonio > Petrelli<[email protected]> wrote: >> So my doubt is: is it better to have lots of modules, even small ones, >> with correctly-managed dependencies, or a small number of modules with >> some optional dependencies that need extra documentation to install >> (even with Maven)? > > By going the modules route do we essentially have a bunch of subprojects? > > I like the idea of having correctly-managed dependencies, rather than > the trouble of dealing with optional dependencies.
I would like to do it *after* the release of 2.2.0 though, if it's not a problem, to let people play with the new features. Obviously it will be an alpha version, since some classes will change package name. Antonio
