2011/6/23 Mck <[email protected]> > On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 12:03 -0500, Greg Reddin wrote: > > > I'm not good at names :-) tiles-parent was good when on Tiles needed to > be > > > built. I don't know what's best here. Probably "tiles-reactor" is good, > or > > > move "tiles-parent" to the main build, or "tiles-main". I really don't > know > > > what to say. > > > > tiles-parent is the pattern I'm most familiar with. I'd suggest we > > name it "tiles-parent" when we move it to trunk. > > tiles-parent is already taken by the tiles3 submodule. > > If we rename the parent we are backtracking its versioning history. > It's currently at 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT but tiles-sandbox is currently at > 1.0-SNAPSHOT. >
With Tiles 3, it is becoming some sort of "umbrella" project. Leaving apart for a moment the fact that Apache usually hates umbrellas, we might think of a new container project that allows simultaneous release. The name could be "tiles-umbrella-parent", or "tiles-sr-parent" (where "sr" stays for Simultaneous Release). As a side note, having different versions in modules is not a problem. Simultaneous release does not mean exact version matching. WDYT? Antonio
