On 11-12-13 03:46 PM, mck wrote:
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 14:46 -0500, Nicolas LE BAS wrote:I am considering that, but it creates a new dependency to the package o.a.t.r.attribute.it makes sense to me that request depends on attribute. (but that attribute remains a standalone package so-to-speak).
Ok, so I just changed the return type to Addable<String>.I also merged the whole branch into trunk and committed it all. Please tell me if you notice anything weird.
Nick.
