On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 10:14 -0400, Nicolas LE BAS wrote:
> It's some extra work at coding, but it doesn't interfere with the
> loading of the initial template, so the testing and debugging should be
> easier. 

It sounds about right yes. I'll take a closer look at
DeferringMustacheFactory.

We're still working our way through things (it's important that
including partials by tiles attribute names works both client and server
side), it may well be that we use lambdas instead of partials... and
that leads to implementing an autotag implementation against lambdas.

But regardless of the partials we do want a way where resource loading
goes through the application context, and we also don't create a very
specific set of mustache classes that can only be used. But this relates
back to your discussion in (3/3) where often only one use-case can be
supported.

~mck

-- 
“The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all
progress depends on the unreasonable man.” - George Bernard Shaw 

| http://github.com/finn-no | http://tech.finn.no |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to