On Wed, 2012-12-26 at 10:56 +0100, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> People who want spring resource loading in tiles might as well
> just use spring-webmvc-3.2 instead.
> 
> 
> Any objection Nicolas if i go ahead with these changes to 
> tiles-request-servlet-wildcard ?
>  - deprecate tiles-request-servlet-wildcard,
>  - deprecate WildcardServletApplicationContext
>  - make WildcardServletApplicationContext an empty subclass of 
> SpringWildcardServletTilesApplicationContext 

The question is whether folk will object to having spring-webmvc and
everything it includes included as opposed to just spring-io.
I'm presuming no. From what i've seen people are for spring dependencies
as a whole or they are not. And here we'll better define that.

~mck

-- 
"If you have any trouble sounding condescending, find a Unix user to
show you how it's done." Scott Adams 

| http://github.com/finn-no | http://tech.finn.no |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to