That's unfortunate, I liked the idea. However, most of the code was written to scrape content from web pages - that's a pretty fragile approach. That said, it looks like we wouldn't lose a lot if we drop it. Thus, no objections from my side.
Cheers, Daniel On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> wrote: > We have this old PR that's just been hanging about: > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/71 > > It's about a year old and probably won't merge anymore. The PR submitter > could never quite come back to it to act on the feedback we provided. It > was a nice idea and a good feature, but it was very rough. I've been of the > opinion to leave it open, thinking someone might pick up on the work, but > now i'm not so sure it's worth waiting anymore and we should just nudge > this in the direction of closing it, especially if the submitter doesn't > intend to work on it. > > My reasoning is pretty simple - this feature really shouldn't be a > TinkerPop feature. It should be a feature of groovysh and should be a PR to > Apache Groovy and not to us. If it went to Groovy, it would > be generally more useful to the whole Groovy community and would likely get > better maintenance and we would just inherit that. > > Anyone feel differently on that? >
