If folks thought it was a good idea, I'd love to put together a little benchmarking harness so that it would be easy to swap various implementations & tweaks in and out to measure how they perform. For example, benchmarks running against different #'s of vertex properties, edge counts, # of properties / edge, measuring things like latency, size in memory, and size on disk. I need to finish up TinkerPop-1254, but then I could take a crack at this. I already have done some work towards this in TinkerPop-1287 to confirm improvements from stream removal in key spots so perhaps I could extend upon that.
--Ted On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Marko Rodriguez <okramma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > TinkerPop 3.3.0 is not slated for anytime soon, but some buddies are > interested in a making the serialization format of StarGraph more > efficient. Given it would be a major breaking change, we can’t do it till > TinkerPop 3.3.0, but we can talk about it and design it. Here is a ticket > to get us underway. Your thoughts are more than welcome: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1343 < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1343> > > Take care, > Marko. > > http://markorodriguez.com > > > >
