Quick question which is probably handled automatically but is this working with multiple cardinalities on properties?
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:05 PM, gallardo.kev...@gmail.com < gallardo.kev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 2016-07-15 16:25 (+0100), "gallardo.kev...@gmail.com"< > gallardo.kev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On 2016-07-09 16:48 (+0100), Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > With all the work on GLVs and the recent work on GraphSON 2.0, I think > it's > > > important that we have a solid, efficient, programming language > neutral, > > > lossless serialization format. Right now that format is GraphSON and it > > > works for that purpose (ever more so with 2.0). Given some discussion > on > > > the GraphSON 2.0 PR driven a bit by Robert Dale: > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/351#issuecomment-231157389 > > > > > > I wonder if we shouldn't consider another IO format that has Gremlin > > > Server/GLVs in mind. At this point I'm not suggesting anything > specific - > > > I'm just hanging the idea out for further discussion and brain > storming. > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > Hey, so I'm trying to gather all infos we have here in order to prepare > to move forward with the implem of GraphSON 2.0, here's what I come up with > : > > > > Things we have : > > - Type format. > > - The structure in Jackson to implement our own type format. > > - All non native Graph types are typed (except the domain specific > types). > > > > New things we need : > > - Types for domain specific objects. > > - Types for all numeric values. > > - Don't serialize empty fields (outV and stuff). > > > > Things we consider changing : > > - Type IDs convention. Before : Java simple class names. Now : starts > with a "domain" like "gremlin" followed by the "type name", which is a > lowercased type name (like "uuid", or "float", or "vertex"). Example : > "gremlin:uuid". > > - Type format ? > > > > Am I missing something ? > > > Hey, > > So I've made a few changes in the code from the original GraphSON 2.0, > with the objectives described above, the code is still messy but I just > thought I'd share some samples to start getting into the work and gather > some feedback. > > In the example I've created a TinkerGraph with 2 vertices connected by an > edge. The graph is serialized as a TinkerGraph. > The samples are there : > https://gist.github.com/newkek/97da94342bc32e571cf4a0ba1018df60 > > Any feedback appreciated. >
