The groovy template engine could work just fine. FYI : http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3793880/lightweight-template-engine-in-java There might be a few interested template engines there as well.
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah - i'm not so good with the sed to the awk to the grep or whatever so > if it can be that simple that would be awesome. The groovy template engine > might be another option. Something like that would work easy enough too I > would guess. I really don't think we need much more than that right now. > > Organizationally, I think we should have a /site directory at the root of > the repo to house the images/html template content and then have it > generate into root /target/site from bin/generate-site.sh. > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Dylan Millikin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hmm sounds like what we would want would be a template engine that would > > help us build the static site. > > If all we need are includes that put together html partials > > (headers/footers) we could make our own. It could be as simple as using > sed > > in bin/generate-web-site.sh > > > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > yes - static html/css and it sucks a bit because we don't have any > re-use > > > going on there. so if we have to change a menu or something it means > > > changing it on every page in the site. would be nice to have some > > re-usable > > > headers/footers and such. i looked into some static site generators a > > while > > > back, but they all seemed like they did too much. maybe i didn't know > > what > > > to look for. > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Dylan Millikin < > [email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > How is the current site structured? Is it just HTML and CSS files? > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Stephen Mallette < > [email protected] > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > no - we don't have one for the main web site. i've wanted to > suggest > > > that > > > > > we change that though and generate the main web site from the > github > > > > repo. > > > > > in that way we could easily accept pull requests and such. i don't > > > think > > > > we > > > > > want to take a full asciidoc approach and the web site generation > > would > > > > > probably stay separate from the doc generation, but it would be > nice > > if > > > > we > > > > > could bin/generate-web-site.sh for a local build of that that thing > > > which > > > > > could then be published to the apache svn repo. anyone else like > that > > > > idea? > > > > > if so, how would it best be done? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Robert Dale <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Is there a git repo for this and the main website? I would like > to > > > > > > make pull requests to fix some things. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Stephen Mallette < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > The download page is now "live" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Stephen Mallette < > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I assume everyone is cool with making the Download Page live > at > > > this > > > > > > point > > > > > > >> as there's been no other feedback in the last few days. I'll > > > > probably > > > > > > make > > > > > > >> some adjustments to the web site tomorrow to bring it online > > > > publicly. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 7:33 AM, Stephen Mallette < > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>> I updated the downloads page some more: > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> + tweaked the date format a bit to "really" match the rest of > > the > > > > > site > > > > > > >>> (which is still inconsistent in other places like changelog - > > > dah) > > > > > > >>> + added a "verifying downloads" section which talks about > > > > > GPG/PGP/etc. > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/downloads.html > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Stephen Mallette < > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>>> Good feedback Robert/Jason. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Updated: > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/downloads.html > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Added documentation and included some descriptors to current > > > > > releases. > > > > > > >>>> Didn't change the date format for now - that's the format we > > use > > > > > > everywhere > > > > > > >>>> around "release" so didn't want to muck with that at this > > point. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Robert Dale < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>>> Stephen, I think what Sebb might be getting at is that some > > > > things > > > > > > >>>>> should be spelled out even if they are obvious to some. I > > agree > > > > > with > > > > > > >>>>> this. > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> 3.2.1 (latest, stable) > > > > > > >>>>> 3.1.3 (bug fixes only) > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> I think the dates should be in ISO8601 format. YYYY-MM-DD > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> Otherwise, I think it looks very good. > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> -- > > > > > > >>>>> Robert Dale > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Jason Plurad < > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > > > > >>>>> > +1 looks great. > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> > Link to the documentation, maybe next to the release > notes > > > > link, > > > > > > >>>>> would be > > > > > > >>>>> > useful too. > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> > -- Jason > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Stephen Mallette < > > > > > > >>>>> [email protected]> > > > > > > >>>>> > wrote: > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> >> I think it might be a good idea to include a "Download > > Page" > > > > on > > > > > > our > > > > > > >>>>> web > > > > > > >>>>> >> site. It would let us better list the versions we have > out > > > > there > > > > > > and > > > > > > >>>>> would > > > > > > >>>>> >> get us better in line with Apache Infrastructure - for > > > > example: > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1255 > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> I'm also seeing that we yet have spots where we dont' > link > > > to > > > > > the > > > > > > >>>>> mirror > > > > > > >>>>> >> system. And finally, it would be nice to have a > "generic" > > > > > download > > > > > > >>>>> page > > > > > > >>>>> >> where we could point external links to - like the new > > > > > > "documentation" > > > > > > >>>>> >> feature in StackOverflow (right now it's sorta hardcoded > > to > > > > the > > > > > > >>>>> mirror > > > > > > >>>>> >> which isn't so good because we'll have to change that > all > > > the > > > > > > time). > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> I quickly took a swipe at such a page: > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/downloads.html > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> It is NOT "linked to" by anything at this point so it is > > > > > > "hidden". I > > > > > > >>>>> just > > > > > > >>>>> >> wanted to have something that everyone could look at to > > get > > > > the > > > > > > idea > > > > > > >>>>> of > > > > > > >>>>> >> what such a page might look like. > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> Thoughts? > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> Thanks, > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> Stephen > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Robert Dale > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
