Kuppitz saw a problem in one of the recipes - note the second example: http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.2/recipes/
no results and this was working in 3.2.1: http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.1/recipes/ His gremlin session shows: gremlin> g.V().hasId(1) ==>v[1] gremlin> g.V().hasId(within(1,2)) gremlin> so damn - i guess we need to scrap this release and fix that problem - i guess i'm -1 based on that..........anyone have a clue as to what changed to cause that problem? On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Daniel Kuppitz <m...@gremlin.guru> wrote: > Validation looks good: > > $ bin/validate-distribution.sh 3.2.2 > > Validating binary distributions > > * downloading Apache TinkerPop Gremlin > (apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-3.2.2-bin.zip)... OK > * validating signatures and checksums ... > * PGP signature ... OK > * MD5 checksum ... OK > * SHA1 checksum ... OK > * unzipping Apache TinkerPop Gremlin ... OK > * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's docs ... OK > * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's binaries ... OK > * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's legal files ... > * LICENSE ... OK > * NOTICE ... OK > * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's plugin directory ... OK > * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's lib directory ... OK > * testing script evaluation ... OK > > * downloading Apache TinkerPop Gremlin > (apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-server-3.2.2-bin.zip)... OK > * validating signatures and checksums ... > * PGP signature ... OK > * MD5 checksum ... OK > * SHA1 checksum ... OK > * unzipping Apache TinkerPop Gremlin ... OK > * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's docs ... OK > * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's binaries ... OK > * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's legal files ... > * LICENSE ... OK > * NOTICE ... OK > * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's plugin directory ... OK > * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's lib directory ... OK > > Validating source distribution > > * downloading Apache TinkerPop 3.2.2 (apache-tinkerpop-3.2.2-src.zip)... > OK > * validating signatures and checksums ... > * PGP signature ... OK > * MD5 checksum ... OK > * SHA1 checksum ... OK > * unzipping Apache TinkerPop 3.2.2 ... OK > OK > > The docs seem to be correct, but I don't like how we now have the numbered > indents, e.g: > > gremlin> g.V().hasLabel("person").groupCount().by(values("age").choose( > ......1> is(lt(28)),constant("young"), > ......2> choose(is(lt(30)), > ......3> constant("old"), > ......4> constant("very old")))) > ==>[young:1,old:1,very old:2] > > > This is bad, since our snippets are now no longer copy+pastable. I will fix > that for the next release. > > All in all: VOTE: +1 > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > We are happy to announce that TinkerPop 3.2.2 is ready for release. > > > > The release artifacts can be found at this location: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/3.2.2/ > > > > The source distribution is provided by: > > apache-tinkerpop-3.2.2-src.zip > > > > Two binary distributions are provided for user convenience: > > apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-3.2.2-bin.zip > > apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-server-3.2.2-bin.zip > > > > The GPG key used to sign the release artifacts is available at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/KEYS > > > > The online docs can be found here: > > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.2/ (user docs) > > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.2/upgrade/ (upgrade docs) > > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/javadocs/3.2.2/core/ (core javadoc) > > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/javadocs/3.2.2/full/ (full javadoc) > > > > The tag in Apache Git can be found here: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tinkerpop.git;a=tag;h= > > 16d28c16ea43c678a18061506b4f0dc6a384fa1e > > > > The release notes are available here: > > https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/3.2.2/ > > CHANGELOG.asciidoc#tinkerpop-322-release-date-september-9-2016 > > > > The [VOTE] will be open for the next 72 hours --- closing Friday > (September > > 9, 2016) at 4pm. > > > > My vote is +1. > > > > Thank you very much, > > > > Stephen > > >
