Hi,
Right now we have:
addV().property(a,b).property(c,d,e,f)
The second property() call creates a c=d vertex property with e=f meta-property.
We could do this:
addV(a,b,c,d).property(c).property(e,f)
That is, addV() has a Object[]… arg. However, seems to be the same length of
characters. Though, without meta-properties:
addV().property(‘a’,b’).property(‘c’,’d’)
…becomes:
addV(‘a’,’b’,’c’,’d’)
I don’t really like Map as that is not a type we use anywhere else…
Marko.
http://markorodriguez.com
> On Sep 28, 2016, at 10:41 AM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Matthias re-opened that issue now looking to see g.addV(Map) given my
> reasoning for closing.
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Anyone interested in seeing a Graph.addVertex(Map) overload?
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1174
>>
>> I don't imagine there would be any change to addV() in this case. I'm
>> thinking that we wouldn't likely use this method internally and so it would
>> more be something for user convenience, in which case, it seems to
>> encourage more use of the Graph API which we're typically trying to do less
>> of.
>>
