I think it's outside of gremlin's scope and may be better served by native facilities. It seems like sugar. In Java this saves not even one line of code. It looks an additional requirement for GLVs to implement possibly using a syntax that is non-native thus additional to learn. But the GLV folks will have to speak to that. Even if so, where do you draw the line? Until you've reimplemented all of CompletableFuture? I already use java's and spring's async facilities so I would not likely use this.
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> wrote: > Please note the discussion on adding a terminal future method to Traversal > on this JIRA ticket: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1490 > > If you have comments, please add them there. -- Robert Dale
