> that was closed, but i noticed this morning that this was open: > > https://github.com/gchq/Gaffer/issues/277 > <https://github.com/gchq/Gaffer/issues/277>
Huh. And that user is a GCHQ organization member. > not sure why they would look to do TinkerPop over REST - we know the > structure API doesn't work so well over that model. Yea, thats weird. Just bind it to the Java API ?!… seems it would be a 3-day exercise. Marko. > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Marko Rodriguez <okramma...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> So this has been around for some time: >> >> https://github.com/gchq/Gaffer <https://github.com/gchq/Gaffer> >> >> At some point I added an Issue to their repo that has since been closed: >> >> https://github.com/gchq/Gaffer/issues/11 <https://github.com/gchq/ >> Gaffer/issues/11> >> >> You can see how awkward their query interface is: >> >> https://github.com/gchq/Gaffer/wiki/Getting-Started < >> https://github.com/gchq/Gaffer/wiki/Getting-Started> >> >> They would be much better served by TinkerPop. >> >> Anyone interested in making Gaffer TinkerPop-compliant? Note that they are >> an Apache2.0 licensed project. >> >> Thanks, >> Marko. >> >> >>
