Hi,

> apart from Basic Graph Patterns and FILTER, as it is shown in 
> https://github.com/dkuppitz/sparql-gremlin 
> <https://github.com/dkuppitz/sparql-gremlin>
This was primarily a proof-of-concept. I believe Kuppitz would be more than 
happy to have someone extend the work and make it “full-fledged.”

Marko.

> 
> Carlos
> 
> El jueves, 20 de octubre de 2016, 8:51:37 (UTC-3), Carlos Buil Aranda 
> escribió:
> nice to know, may I ask why using RDF4J instead of Apache Jena? I'm just 
> curious, I have more experience using Jena but I also know about RDF4j. Also, 
> my understanding is that Tinkerpop currently does not support SPARQL, right?
> 
> I will keep an eye on the list for the need of contributions.
> 
> thanks!
> 
> Carlos
> 
> El miércoles, 19 de octubre de 2016, 16:46:38 (UTC-3), Joshua Shinavier 
> escribió:
> I have gotten a few more pings lately about projects needing generic RDF 
> support in TinkerPop3 (see GraphSail and PropertyGraphSail from TP2), 
> including SPARQL and RDFS inference support.  I think I/we will start 
> developing this soon.  I will be soliciting contributions and feedback from 
> potential users of the RDF tools, which will most likely use Eclipse RDF4j.
> 
> Josh
> 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Carlos Buil Aranda <[email protected] <>> 
> wrote:
> 
> hello,
> 
> sorry for opening up such an old message, but I have quite a bit of 
> experience with SPARQL and I may be able to help in developing an extension 
> to Tinkerpop for accepting SPARQL queries using Jena. Is this still an open 
> problem?
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Carlos
> 
> El viernes, 18 de septiembre de 2015, 13:49:16 (UTC-3), Marko A. Rodriguez 
> escribió:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> Daniel Kuppitz did some really cool work getting SPARQL to compile to 
> Gremlin's instruction set. 
> 
>       https://github.com/dkuppitz/sparql-gremlin 
> <https://github.com/dkuppitz/sparql-gremlin>
>               
> http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/the-benefits-of-the-gremlin-graph-traversal-machine#section2
>  
> <http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/the-benefits-of-the-gremlin-graph-traversal-machine#section2>
> 
> Right now, this work is in Kuppitz' personal repo. However, I was thinking 
> that it would be good to boost up this project such that we may someday merge 
> it into Apache TinkerPop.
> 
> Why?
> 
>       1. We have 3 reference graph system implementations in TinkerPop.
>               - TinkerGraph (POJO -- OLTP/OLAP)
>               - Neo4j (OLTP)
>               - Hadoop (OLAP)
>       2. We have 2 reference graph language implementations in TinkerPop.
>               - Gremlin-Java8
>               - Gremlin-Groovy
> 
> Why not have 3 language reference implementations AND have SPARQL-Gremlin be 
> that 3rd language because:
> 
>       1. It would demonstrate a language that is not embedded in a 
> host-language (e.g. Java8, Groovy, Scala, etc.)
>       2. It would give TinkerPop an automatic RDF story without us having to 
> do the whole Sesame/Jena song-and-dance.
> 
> Talking with Kuppitz, he likes the idea but is not too interested in 
> deep-diving into SPARQL and spending too much of his time on this body of 
> work. 
> 
> Perhaps someone out there in TinkerLand is an expert in SPARQL, understands 
> the visitor-pattern used in the SPARQL-Gremlin compiler (uses Apache Jena's 
> ARQ parser), and is willing to fully flesh out all the features of SPARQL 
> into Gremlin.
> 
> Hope someone bites.
> 
> Take care,
> Marko.
> 
> http://markorodriguez.com <http://markorodriguez.com/>
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Gremlin-users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gremlin-users/cef79d90-8ff3-435d-a546-027cc34211f3%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gremlin-users/cef79d90-8ff3-435d-a546-027cc34211f3%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.

Reply via email to