let's try to avoid the nays at this point please ;)

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Ted Wilmes <twil...@gmail.com> wrote:

> We're close on this one, anyone else have a vote, yay or nay?
>
> Thanks,
> Ted
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > bin/validate-distribution.sh worked for me VOTE +1
> >
> > note that the "tag link" doesn't go directly to the tag - this does:
> >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tinkerpop.git;a=tag;h=
> > 89a17c3b4b5d33cbd9a8f4f587f6e41dc5dd30d7
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Ted Wilmes <twil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > We are happy to announce that TinkerPop 3.1.5 is ready for release.
> > >
> > > The release artifacts can be found at this location:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/3.1.5/
> > >
> > > The source distribution is provided by:
> > > apache-tinkerpop-3.1.5-src.zip
> > >
> > > Two binary distributions are provided for user convenience:
> > > apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-3.1.5-bin.zip
> > > apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-server-3.1.5-bin.zip
> > >
> > > The GPG key used to sign the release artifacts is available at:
> > >     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/KEYS
> > >
> > > The online docs can be found here:
> > > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.1.5/reference/ (user docs)
> > > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.1.5/upgrade/ (upgrade docs)
> > > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/javadocs/3.1.5/core/ (core javadoc)
> > > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/javadocs/3.1.5/full/ (full javadoc)
> > >
> > > The tag in Apache Git can be found here:
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tinkerpop.git;3.1.5
> > >
> > > The release notes are available here:
> > > https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/3.1.5/
> > > CHANGELOG.asciidoc#tinkerpop-315-release-date-october-17-2016
> > >
> > > The [VOTE] will be open for the next 72 hours --- closing Thursday
> > (October
> > > 20, 2016) at 10:00 AM CST.
> > >
> > > My vote is +1.
> > >
> > > Thank you very much,
> > > Ted Wilmes
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to