In case it is of any use to you guys (I just saw these messages now, I know its a year late)... 1) Ferma is now on an Apache v2 license. So no worries there. 2) I havent done recent TP3 benchmarks, anyone have any they can point me to so I can evaluate if i can start recommending TP3 yet?
On Monday, 27 July 2015 09:10:23 UTC-4, Rômulo Victor wrote: > > Hi Jeffrey, > I have a question concerning the license used by the Ferma project, which > is OSCL type C. From what I've read here > <http://wiki.syncleus.com/index.php/Syncleus:Open_Source_Community_License_-_Type_C>, > > it is more restrictive than Apache License but less restrictive than GPL. > Is that correct? Could you please explain how they differ? > Thanks for your attention. > > Em segunda-feira, 13 de julho de 2015 14:36:23 UTC-3, Jeffrey Freeman > escreveu: >> >> Hey guys. You might recall my post from a little while back comparing the >> various ORM/OGM including benchmarks of them all (Totorom, Frames, Ferma, >> Blueprints, and Gremlin). Well thanks to the contribution of the Peapod >> developer we now also expanded these benchmarks to compare against Peapod >> and Tinkerpop3, So I wanted to share the results with everyone here. >> >> The results for Tinkerpop3 were less than promising showing a huge >> performance hit in the new version over the old something on the order of >> 10x slower or more. Since Peapod is built on Tinkerpop3 it suffers the same >> poor performance (and adds some overhead of its own of course). >> >> The full results can be viewed on this page, it also includes a link to >> the GitHub project hosting the code for the benchmarks: >> http://wiki.syncleus.com/index.php/Ferma:Comparing_the_Alternatives >> >
