That's probably fair. Perhaps that's a good rule. At least one person
should use CPU to do the docker build and mention that on the PR as part of
their VOTE. I also suppose some PRs won't even need the docker run at all.
We can just use some common sense with that "rule".

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Daniel Kuppitz <[email protected]> wrote:

> Talking about sparing CPU cycles: docker/build.sh -t -i -n takes time, lots
> of time. I used to run it regardless of whether somebody else already did
> it or not. I won't do that anymore and instead rely on idempotent results
> (in the end that's why we originally created the Docker containers). Hence,
> if anybody already ran the full build, I will only look through the code
> changes and if they look good to me - VOTE: +1.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > We're backing up pretty heavily on pull request reviews/votes.
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pulls
> >
> > Can any committers help us along with some reviews/votes?
> >
> > Remember - you don't need to have full knowledge of the code to
> participate
> > in a code review. If the code comes from a core contributor (e.g. marko
> > submitting a gremlin-spark bug fix), you mostly need to focus on the big
> > picture and generalities of the change and then do a "mvn clean install"
> or
> > better yet "docker.build.sh -t -i -n". If it all works then "VOTE +1".
> >
> > Most pull requests for review are super simple, like this one:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/465 (removed deprecated
> classes)
> >
> > All you need to do is check if the classes are gone, if upgrade docs are
> > updated and if the thing builds...done. VOTE +1.
> >
> > Doing reviews is a huge help to the project (even for those who are not
> > committers and don't have binding votes, as it is a great way to get
> > visibility in the project and learn more about how it works). It would be
> > great if folks could make a habit of sparing a few CPU cycles for
> TinkerPop
> > at the end of a work day or while you sleep so that we can continue to
> stay
> > agile in our development.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
>

Reply via email to