For specification I mean a formal documentation detailing the GLV API for a certain language, including naming convention, return types, limitations and side effects that can be versioned along with Apache TinkerPop.
With that specification as part of the TK documentation, an implementer could state "Supports Apache TinkerPop C# GLV 3.3" On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> wrote: > Could you expand on what you mean by a "GLV spec" that you mention in item > A? > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:38 AM, Jorge Bay Gondra < > [email protected] > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > After the [Javascript GLV][1], I'm thinking of creating a GLV for C#, > but I > > don't know if a GLV for a language like C# or C++ with no JVM support > > (decent JVM language implementation nor scripting support) belongs in the > > TinkerPop repository as it won't be able to easily integrate with the > rest > > of the projects. > > > > A) Should we include only a GLV spec for those languages? > > B) Should we create a full GLV inside the TK repo, adding the build tools > > for those runtimes as dependencies to run the tests ? > > > > Thanks, > > Jorge > > > > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1489 > > >
