Hi all,
I am working on a Kerberos Authenticator for the existing sasl plugin
mechanism for gremlin-server. I would be happy to contribute it as a PR
to TinkerPop, but would like some feedback before making the effort to
do so.
So these are my questions:
1. Would TinkerPop welcome a Kerberos plugin as part of the
gremlin-server distribution, provided it meets quality standards?
2. Is the Apache directory-kerby project an acceptable testing
framework, given that it only has RC status:
https://github.com/apache/directory-kerby/tree/kerby-all-1.0.0-RC2 (it
is provided from maven, though). I have experienced it as very pleasant
to use. I will use the plugin myself in an freeIPA Kerberos
environment, but will not provide tests for that.
3. Would additional config files for gremlin-console and
gremlin-server be acceptable (more helpful than mere documentation, but
both already have a considerable number of config files to choose from)?
4. Would slight changes to the gremlin-server logging be acceptable
(to enable audit logging items with both the authorized user and the
issued gremlin query)?
Cheers, Marc de Lignie
