[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15827941#comment-15827941
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1600:
-------------------------------------------

Github user spmallette commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/533
  
    @vtslab  i just pushed a fixup commit - i had a sorta dumb mistake on this 
pr. i knew that having your work would uncover this - it's good that you had 
#534 ready. I merged your changes locally onto this branch and the tests now 
pass without any additional changes on your end.
    
    I'm going to get this merged to tp32/master now. At that point you can 
rebase (hopefully the last time) and I can put some focus on full review of 
your PR.


> Consistent use of base 64 encoded bytes for SASL negotiation
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-1600
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1600
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: driver, server
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.3
>            Reporter: stephen mallette
>            Assignee: stephen mallette
>             Fix For: 3.2.4
>
>
> Gremlin Server currently uses a mix of base 64 encoded bytes and byte arrays 
> for SASL negotiation. This can cause problems for certain serializers (like 
> toString serialization with gryo) as the byte array won't be respected. In an 
> effort to easily support virtually any serializer a switch to using just base 
> 64 string is probably best. 
> This can be done in such a way as to be backward compatible. The base64 SASL 
> value will be returned in the response message status attributes map in a key 
> called "sasl". The original byte array will continue to be returned in the 
> response message result. Eventually, we could phase out the byte array in the 
> result - perhaps with 3.3.0.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to