Thanks Ted - any takers for 3.2.4? I'd be happy to do it with someone if
there is interest in learning the process.

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Ted Wilmes <[email protected]> wrote:

> Code freeze Friday sounds good to me.  Yes, I'll be submitting a PR for the
> PathRetractionStrategy bugs (1583 & 1597).
>
> I can take the 3.1.6 release.
>
> --Ted
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Marko Rodriguez <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > @Ted — Do you think you can fix the PathRetractionStrategy bugs for this
> > release, please?
> >
> > Marko.
> >
> > http://markorodriguez.com
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Jan 23, 2017, at 7:57 AM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > It's been a while since we've had a release (October 2016) and given
> the
> > > importance of the recent critical security fix from Groovy 2.4.8 I
> think
> > > it's worth getting some new versions out there. I'm not sure what
> > everyone
> > > is working on or has concerns about, but after the PRs that are out
> there
> > > for tp32 get merged (especially https://github.com/apache/
> > tinkerpop/pull/541)
> > > I don't really have anything else critical for those versions. Please
> > call
> > > out any issues that might be important for this release on this thread.
> > >
> > > I don't think we should worry about doing a milestone release of 3.3.0
> > yet.
> > > I'd like to see some more change go into that branch before we do that,
> > but
> > > if others feel differently and would like to offer an argument I'd be
> > open
> > > to the idea.
> > >
> > > I propose we focus on a release of 3.1.6 and 3.2.4 in two weeks time
> with
> > > the code freeze going into place at end of day friday of this week
> > (January
> > > 27, 2017). If there are no objections in the next three days (Thursday,
> > > January 26, 2017, 10:00am), let's assume lazy consensus and move
> forward
> > > with that plan.
> > >
> > > Assuming we do move forward with a release, are there any volunteers
> for
> > > release manager?
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to