[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1642?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15946055#comment-15946055
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1642:
-------------------------------------------
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/587
Yeah - @okram mentioned the same thing. I thought it had passed for me
earlier. I had a number of builds running on different systems. I think I
attributed that failure to a different branch by mistake. Anyway - now that
we've confirmed that there is a build issue, I wonder what the problem is. I
don't recall doing anything with `sack()` in this change. Judging from the
failing line, it looks like `sideEffects` field in `B_LP_O_S_SE_SL_Traverser`
is null.
> Improve performance of mutating traversals
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-1642
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1642
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: process
> Affects Versions: 3.2.4
> Reporter: stephen mallette
> Assignee: stephen mallette
> Priority: Critical
>
> Make an attempt improve performance of mutating traversals. Some general
> goals for this ticket should be to:
> 1. Improve performance parity of structure and process methods for modifying
> the graph - structure is pretty far ahead.
> 2. Improve the speed of large chained mutating traversals - see
> http://stackoverflow.com/q/41926409/1831717
> 3. Determine ways to make these performance improvements in {{gremlin-core}}
> so that they may benefit all {{Graph}} implementations
> 4. Improve the speed of TinkerGraph specifically if possible as it is used
> for subgraphing functions in many cases and ends up being useful regardless
> of the graph implementation ultimately used.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
