I've had some contact with the CosmosDB devs and mentioned the issues with the docs + branding. They are fine to make changes. I've submitted a PR with some initial stuff:
https://github.com/Microsoft/azure-docs/pull/1751 which should deal with the branding concerns. If anyone sees other improvements that could be made it might be worthwhile to issue a PR because those docs are good exposure for TinkerPop and Gremlin. On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 6:48 AM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> wrote: > I modified the github description of the old TinkerPop projects to be > suffixed with: > > > (no longer active - see Apache TinkerPop) > > and then changed the website link to http://tinkerpop.apache.org. I also > updated the READMEs to fix some links. Hopefully, that does the trick, but > we'll see......... > > > > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > I think we have a bit of a branding issue though. >> >> Any Microsoft folks on the dev list whom we can talk to about that? >> >> If we get crickets, I think some of their docs are in github - maybe >> someone could submit some PRs for more "Apache TinkerPop" and appropriate >> links. As for: >> >> > * redirect http://gremlin.tinkerpop.com to http://tinkerpop.apache.org >> /gremlin.html >> >> maybe it's time to break that old link to TinkerPop 2 for >> gremlin.tinkerpop.com. i'd rather that people find the right stuff and >> somehow they still seem to fail at it. I loved this answer from Mr Plurad >> on SO: >> >> http://stackoverflow.com/a/43590090/1831717 >> >> filled the entire page with the "cancelled gremlin" :) >> >> > * update the text description and URL to make Apache TinkerPop more >> > prominent >> on https://github.com/tinkerpop/gremlin >> >> I can update that - ideas on what should we put in there? maybe all >> descriptions should be updated? >> >> > You can use robots.txt to decrease ranking and/or drop the page out of >> the index altogether over time >> >> Taken from that same page it would be nice if we could do: "use the >> noindex robots meta tag or X-Robots-Tag HTTP header" on old pages. anyone >> know how to update our scripts to have a >> >> bin/publish-docs.sh --retire 3.2.3 >> >> that would just do that automatically? is that hard? >> >> >> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Misha Brukman < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Jason Plurad <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > I'm +1 on adding CosmoDB. >>> > >>> > I think we have a bit of a branding issue though. Most of their docs >>> talk >>> > about the Gremlin graph language, and they generally fail to mention >>> > "Apache TinkerPop", which perhaps makes sense if they're not directly >>> > implementing TinkerPop's Java APIs. I don't think "Apache Gremlin" was >>> > trademarked by the ASF? >>> > >>> > Google still isn't helping either since many of the top links refer to >>> > TinkerPop 2 items (which do have the deprecated warning). A couple >>> ideas >>> > based on the top search results: >>> > * redirect http://gremlin.tinkerpop.com to >>> > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/gremlin.html >>> > * update the text description and URL to make Apache TinkerPop more >>> > prominent on https://github.com/tinkerpop/gremlin >>> >>> >>> You can use robots.txt to decrease ranking and/or drop the page out of >>> the >>> index altogether over time (incoming links may prevent immediate drop out >>> of the index): >>> >>> - >>> https://developers.google.com/webmasters/control-crawl-inde >>> x/docs/faq#h17 >>> - https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/6062608?hl=en >>> >>> Misha >>> >> >> >
