[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16016991#comment-16016991
]
Florian Hockmann commented on TINKERPOP-1552:
---------------------------------------------
That's actually how I tried it first, but I had problems with the `pom.xml`
files. The problem was that the `dotnet-maven-plugin` doesn't work with the
standard maven project structure with a `src/main/language` directory
structure. So I had to create a new `pom` file for every sub directory from
`gremlin-dotnet` down to for example
`gremlin-dotnet/src/main/csharp/Gremlin.CSharp` where `csharp` is the parent
project of `Gremlin.CSharp` and so on. I found all those projects files too
confusing. That is why I created instead a _.NET only_ project
`gremlin-dotnet`. But since I have basically no experience with maven it could
also be that it is possible to do it in a much easier way.
Another option would be to use something else instead of the
`dotnet-maven-plugin` like a simple executor plugin. I personally like the
`dotnet-maven-plugin` as it integrates .NET very nicely into maven in my
opinion, but I am of course also ok with an alternative solution.
Good to here that you didn't run into any problems with the build.
> C# Gremlin Language Variant
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-1552
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1552
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: language-variant
> Affects Versions: 3.2.3
> Reporter: Jorge Bay
>
> It would be nice to have a C# GLV that runs under .NET Framework 4.5+ and
> .NET Core.
> The maven build could use the Exec Maven Plugin to exec .NET Core's [dotnet
> test|https://www.microsoft.com/net/core#macos] command.
> Some requirements, from the mailing list (edited):
> {quote}
> 1. The GLV should keep in line with class/method names of the java API
> where possible to ensure consistency of feel across languages.
> 2. There needs to be adequate tests (we're still discussing the approach to
> testing GLVs and i think that needs to be tackled sooner than later as more
> GLVs start to come in). Those tests should produce xunit style output
> unless there is some good reason not to.
> 3. There needs to be adequate documentation (e.g. Reference docs)
> 4. The build/deploy process needs to be bound to maven which might be one of
> the trickier bits to deal with.
> {quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
