Thanks Stephen. If we can get 3.3 better mapped out, that would be great. Your response on that other thread made it sound like 3.3 was a no-go for this year.
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> wrote: > Interesting you brought this up. I was going to start a discussion on it > actually next week when I started another discussion about 3.2.5/3.1.7 > release. I think we should just talk about how to release 3.3.0. Let's just > figure out what things need to absolutely go in 3.3.0 and then aim for a > release date. > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Jason Plurad <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This question > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/gremlin-users/rPguKVm3GVE/f1OdIFvBAwAJ> > > on > > TinkerPop 3.3 on the Gremlin users list ultimately comes back to Scala > 2.11 > > support > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/janusgraph-users/ > UypKyqnWqzc/eaQUOR2IDAAJ > > >. > > I can understand that some features slated for 3.3 might be far off ( > > TINKERPOP-1564 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1564>), > > but > > I don't think we should hold up on updating core dependencies such as > > Spark+Scala. > > > > Azure Cosmos DB (based on TP 3.2.4) recently published > > <https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/spark-connector-graph> > > about connecting > > it to Spark, and it tells the developer to build TinkerPop master (TP > > 3.3.0-SNAPSHOT) because Azure HDInsight uses Spark 2.0. > > > > We ran into a similar issue when TInkerPop 3.0 came out with the Hadoop 1 > > dependency rather than Hadoop 2, and I think a lot of users had already > > moved > > to Hadoop 2 > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/gremlin-users/_9UD6STUUOE/iEr2qoxFAQAJ> > > by > > then. Side note, I don't know what the schedule for Hadoop 3 is, but they > > already have alpha versions available. > > > > Spark 2.0 came out in July 2016, and it has been integrated on master > > since September > > 2016 > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/gremlin-users/j7lDGg5pIo8/QNWaFC3ABQAJ > >. > > Spark 2 builds with Scala 2.11 by default. If we can't get the next > > TinkerPop release until next year, TinkerPop's Spark+Scala dependencies > > will be very far out of date. > > > > Would it make sense to cherry pick Spark 2.0 support into the tp32 > branch? > > >
