[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16065117#comment-16065117
 ] 

Robert Dale commented on TINKERPOP-479:
---------------------------------------

[~dkuppitz] After some real world tests, the {{fold()}} technique and the 
original {{..coalesce(__.V().has()...}} perform very closely when working with 
an embedded graph.  However, when using {{withRemote()}},  the original 
performs 2-3x better!  And oddly enough, if the data was populated, {{fold()}} 
performance stayed the same or did worse than loading data to a clean db.  The 
original gremlin performance improved when data was populated. Looks like I'm 
staying with the original gremlin. :D

> Consider Providing "getOrCreate" Functionality
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-479
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-479
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: structure
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.2-incubating
>            Reporter: stephen mallette
>
> One of the most commonly written functions used is good ol' "getOrCreate" 
> where you want to get a {{Vertex}} if it exists or create it with supplied 
> properties if it does not.  We currently have a "helper" function for this on 
> {{ElementHelper}} 
> https://github.com/tinkerpop/tinkerpop3/blob/6d0f00865f673cb0739f6f310e1868425f732924/gremlin-core/src/main/java/com/tinkerpop/gremlin/structure/util/ElementHelper.java#L62
> but perhaps it is time to treat this issue as a first class citizen as part 
> of the Graph API.  I think that some vendors might actually be able to 
> optimize this function as well.  
> Another aspect of "getOrCreate" is "upsert" as well as options to ensure 
> uniqueness.  All of these things we've at some point or another built 
> variations of outside of TinkerPop for applications, data loading, etc.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to