That makes good sense to me. I'd be honored to lead it off into the sunset.

--Ted

On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 6:14 AM, Jorge Bay Gondra <jorgebaygon...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> 3.1 line is about 2 years old, I think its a lot of time for a relatively
> new project like TinkerPop.
> I'm in favor of making 3.1.8 the last release of the 3.1 branch.
>
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > We have taken backward compatibility and long term support to a new level
> > in TinkerPop 3.x as compared with previous major versions. We're about to
> > go on eight releases of the 3.1.x line of code. Now that 3.3.0 is about
> to
> > release I'm wondering if we need to continue with support of any kind on
> > the 3.1.x line (similar to how we stopped completely stopped dev on
> 3.0.x).
> >
> > I can expand this discussion to the user mailing list, but I thought I'd
> > start here to see what people thought. Can we make 3.1.8 our last release
> > on that line of code?
> >
>

Reply via email to