[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16141202#comment-16141202
]
Anish Doshi commented on TINKERPOP-1756:
----------------------------------------
Thanks for the quick response [~spmallette]. Appreciate it.
We are not really using client at all. We only create a
{{GraphTraversalSource}} by calling
{{graph.traversal().withRemote(DriverRemoteConnection.using(this.cluster,
"g"))}} to traverse the graph. For this, we would like to pass in a mock
{{Cluster}}. So this was the issue that we faced.
There are well documented reasons why PowerMock should not be used:
* https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30162200/why-not-powermock
* http://automationrhapsody.com/powermock-examples-better-not-use/
And we do not intend to use PowerMock just to mock {{Cluster}}. PowerMock
normalises bad designs and we would like to refrain from using it.
> I wish Cluster was an interface so that I could mock it
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-1756
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1756
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: driver
> Affects Versions: 3.2.4
> Reporter: Anish Doshi
>
> {{org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.driver.Cluster}} is currently a final class.
> Which means that every time I need to mock this class, I cannot. I have to
> create a separate object and mock that object instead of mocking {{Cluster}}.
> Is there a chance that Cluster can be changed to an interface, or at least
> not have as a {{final}} class?
> Thanks.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
