I've forgotten about TINKERPOP-1730 and TINKERPOP-1731 was not under my
radar... makes sense to target 3.2.7 / 3.3.1.

I think I'll be able to dedicate some time to those tickets by the end of
this week.

Thanks,
Jorge

On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks for bringing this up, Jorge. There were a handful of blockers that
> everyone seemed to agree on that prevented us from going right to GA for
> 3.2.6/3.3.0. Here were some of the key blockers that I remember:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1731 - docker build needs
> to work for .NET - pretty crucial
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1734 - it seems we have a
> pattern for DSLs - just need to document it
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1730 - we need everything
> supporting the latest GraphSON version for full Gremlin support
>
> finally - and we don't have a ticket yet that i know of - but we really
> should figure out how to fully test .NET Gremlin against the test suite.
> Not sure how that will work - it will need some thought and will need to be
> generalized so that we can use that same pattern against future GLVs that
> aren't on the JVM at all.
>
> I think we should focus on trying to clear these issues (and others if they
> exist) for 3.2.7/3.3.1 so that we can go full GA with .NET for those
> releases. Does that sound like a plan?
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Jorge Bay Gondra <jorgebaygon...@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I think starting with a release candidate of the Gremlin.Net language
> > variant package was a good choice for the first official release of the
> > package after being included in TinkerPop project.
> >
> > Now that the release candidate has been individually checked, it would be
> > nice to move forward and make a GA release of 3.2.6 and 3.3.0, that way
> it
> > can be the default download on nuget.org
> > <https://www.nuget.org/packages/Gremlin.Net> (prereleases are not shown
> on
> > dotnet toolchain by default) and we can make it easier for newcomers to
> use
> > the GLV.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Jorge
> >
>

Reply via email to