[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16373468#comment-16373468
]
stephen mallette commented on TINKERPOP-1900:
---------------------------------------------
I guess I can agree that some of those classes might be helpful. You named two
specific classes but, do you have a full list of test classes you would want to
have?
tbh, i don't really like the idea of putting test classes in the main
packaging, but let's see just which classes you think would be useful first
before i generate any solid opinion.
> Jar gremlin server /src/test directory
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-1900
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1900
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: server
> Affects Versions: 3.2.7
> Reporter: David Pitera
> Priority: Major
>
> There are utility classes inside the /src/test directory that would be useful
> for implementor's implementing internal sever components (for example, one
> implementing a Channelizer might make use of
> AbstractGremlinServerIntegrationTest and TestClientFactory). If we update the
> packaging so that the gremlin-server jars include these binaries,
> implementor's can make use of existing code without duplicating it.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
