[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16373468#comment-16373468
 ] 

stephen mallette commented on TINKERPOP-1900:
---------------------------------------------

I guess I can agree that some of those classes might be helpful. You named two 
specific classes but, do you have a full list of test classes you would want to 
have? 

tbh, i don't really like the idea of putting test classes in the main 
packaging, but let's see just which classes you think would be useful first 
before i generate any solid opinion.

> Jar gremlin server /src/test directory
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-1900
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1900
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: server
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.7
>            Reporter: David Pitera
>            Priority: Major
>
> There are utility classes inside the /src/test directory that would be useful 
> for implementor's implementing internal sever components (for example, one 
> implementing a Channelizer might make use of 
> AbstractGremlinServerIntegrationTest and TestClientFactory). If we update the 
> packaging so that the gremlin-server jars include these binaries, 
> implementor's can make use of existing code without duplicating it.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to