[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16388093#comment-16388093
 ] 

Florian Hockmann commented on TINKERPOP-1885:
---------------------------------------------

There seems to be a new .NET logo which is just a purple circle with _.NET_ in 
it. So I created a possible logo which combines running Gremlin with this .NET 
logo (see attachment). This has the nice benefit that it basically reads as 
Gremlin + .NET. Would be good to get some feedback on this before I add it to 
the repo.

I think that it makes sense to also add the logo to the reference docs, but I'm 
not sure about the section _TinkerPop-Enabled Query Languages_ [on this 
site|http://tinkerpop.apache.org/providers.html]. Do we want to add all GLVs 
there?

> Various Gremlin.Net documentation updates
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-1885
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1885
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: documentation, dotnet
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.7, 3.3.1
>            Reporter: Florian Hockmann
>            Assignee: Florian Hockmann
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 3.2.8, 3.3.2
>
>         Attachments: gremlin-dotnet-logo.png
>
>
> We have some parts of the documentation regarding Gremlin.Net that should be 
> updated now that we have a stable release:
>  * Homepage: _Query Languages_ misses a reference to Gremlin.Net
>  * Homepage: _Language Drivers_ section still links to the repository on my 
> private account. It should probably link to the Gremlin.Net section in the 
> reference docs or to a {{README}} (see below).
>  * Reference docs still contain a warning that _Gremlin.Net does not yet have 
> an official release._
>  * Add a {{README}} that explains Gremlin.Net, similar to the documents we 
> have for the Python and Javascript GLVs.
>  * The {{csproj}} file contains a pretty extensive {{summary}} element, but 
> {{summary}} isn't part of the {{csproj}} standard. So it isn't used for 
> anything. It should be merged into the {{description}} element instead.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to