[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16508167#comment-16508167
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1836:
-------------------------------------------
Github user FlorianHockmann commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/867
> we require nuget (to run nuget pack) only as part of the deploy phase.
I understand that part and I don't have anything against it, especially
when we add something to the "Pre-flight Check" step as @spmallette suggests.
But @jorgebay, what's your reasoning behind
> I would like to propose that we generate and build Gremlin.Net.Template
project and run its tests as part of the package phase
?
Shouldn't the template be built and tested in the same phases as
Gremlin.Net itself?
> .NET sample project
> -------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-1836
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1836
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: dotnet
> Affects Versions: 3.2.6
> Reporter: stephen mallette
> Assignee: Florian Hockmann
> Priority: Minor
>
> Create a sample project that can help get users started with .NET and
> Gremlin. Should probably be added to the series of gremlin-archetype
> projects. It seems .NET already has something analogous to archetypes with
> "dotnet templates". I'm not sure how those work or are
> built/deployed/distributed but we would probably want to ensure that those
> aspects are somehow still handled by maven if we can.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
